What makes us unique?

The problem:

Our client, a young female child, walked into a neighboring home to visit one of her friends. As she was in the kitchen, a Pitbull dog decided to violently attack our client. The attack caused serious injuries throughout the minor child’s body including multiple bite wounds, lacerations, and nearly tearing off the young child’s ear. Our client suffered substantial medical expense, permanent scarring throughout her body, and post-traumatic stress disorder as a result of the attack. It was determined that the dog owner rented the property, and that renter had no insurance of their own. The homeowner, who was the landlord, had homeowner’s insurance. That insurance company initially denied liability as they advised that they did not know a dog was even present within the household.

Our solution:

Our team went to work immediately and determined that the dog that attacked our client was a vicious dog that had been trained for fighting. In fact, while the dog was being quarantined at the animal control facility after the attack, someone broke into the animal control shelter and absconded with the dog, leaving the state. The authorities tracked the dog down out of state and brought it back to West Virginia where it was euthanized.

We were able to successfully convince the insurance carrier that their insured improperly inspected its rental property and failed to remove the vicious animal from their home prior to our client being attacked. We were able to obtain a 6-figure settlement for our client.

Once the court approved the minor child’s settlement, we worked with a structured settlement company to invest the child’s money so that she would have significant payments over a period of time after she turned eighteen.

The problem:

Our client was traveling on a two-lane road in West Virginia in his work truck owned by his employer. While rounding a curve, a vehicle heading in the opposite direction lost control, crossed the center line, and caused a traumatic crash with our client’s vehicle. That crash caused serious injuries including compartment syndrome and resulting surgical procedures to his lower extremity. His injury caused substantial medical expenses, past lost wages, and lost earning capacity. Unfortunately, the at fault driver was uninsured at the time of the crash. Our client was fearful that he would never be able to work again and would not be able to receive compensation for his severe damages. Additionally, the uninsured motorist carrier for the employer denied coverage stating that the employer had not paid its insurance premiums. Based on the facts, we believed that was an improper denial of insurance coverage.

Our solution:

Our team filed a lawsuit in circuit court alleging that our client was entitled to recovery against the at fault and uninsured driver and was also entitled to a recovery from the employer’s and client’s insurance carriers. We included a claim for declaratory relief against the insurance company stating that they improperly denied coverage, added a count for declaratory relief against our client’s insurance carrier for uninsured motorist coverage, and alleged that the insurance company was acting in bad faith. Through the discovery process and litigation, we proved that the insurance company and its agent made false allegations and hid information in an attempt to avoid insurance coverage. After a significant amount of work, both insurance companies agreed to pay, and our client received a seven-figure settlement.

The problem:

Our client was seriously injured in an automobile fire while assisting another motorist as part of his employment with the State of West Virginia. The other motorist, who negligently caused the fire, was without insurance. Our client’s insurance company quickly paid the $20,000 state-mandated uninsured motorist coverage. However, the State of West Virginia denied that he was also entitled to coverage under the state’s $1,000,000 uninsured motorist coverage, claiming that he fell within an exclusion to the coverage because he was also entitled to workers’ compensation coverage.

Our solution:

We stayed the case pending the resolution of an appeal of a different case involving the same issue, of which we became aware while building our case. After that appeal was concluded, we negotiated a settlement which provided sufficient up-front revenue for our client to purchase a home and a car.

A major portion of this recovery was placed in a “structured settlement” which will provide monthly income to the client and his wife. It also provides favorable tax treatment for that recovery.

Additionally, a special needs trust was created which will be the payee of the settlement funds, thereby allowing our client to continue to receive governmental assistance with his medical care, which is a substantial additional benefit in light of his serious burn injuries.

The problem:

Our client felt it had been underpaid under the terms of a coal brokerage contract.

Our solution:

After much investigation and several years of litigation, a seven-figure settlement was paid to our client.

The problem:

Our client was traveling on a two-lane rural road in Pocahontas County West Virginia when she was rounding a very sharp curve in her lane. While doing so, a logging truck traveling in the opposite direction crossed over the center dividing lines, and the rear tires of the logging truck trailer crashed into the front of our client’s vehicle. As a result of that contact, our client crashed violently into a nearby guardrail. The log truck kept driving, never to be found. The client suffered severe injuries, including fractures to her lower extremity which required surgical repair. A hit and run vehicle in West Virginia is called a “phantom vehicle.” If you can prove that the phantom vehicle contacted your vehicle causing injury, you are entitled to uninsured motorist coverage under your own insurance policy. Our client’s· insurance carrier denied coverage for our client’s serious injuries, claiming that we could not prove contact between our contact’s vehicle and the logging truck.

Our solution:

Our team went to work investigating the claim and determined that the insurance company was wrong in many ways. We determined that the insurance company had taken our client’s vehicle to a storage facility and later sold that vehicle for salvage before our client could obtain the proper evidence of contact between her vehicle and the logging truck. Our team filed a lawsuit in the circuit court alleging that the insurance company was guilty of “spoliation” which basically means that the insurance company failed to preserve evidence necessary for our client to prove her cause of action. We also alleged the insurance company was guilty of bad faith in its failure to afford coverage to our client. The insurance company hired an attorney, and we litigated this case. At mediation, the insurance carrier still offered zero dollars to resolve the claim. We continued to litigate this case over the next several months. A few days before the jury trial, the insurance company offered a sizeable six-figure settlement to resolve the claim. We settled the claim, and our client received the compensation she deserved.

The problem:

Our client was injured in an auto accident. However, the investigating officer found him to be at fault and issued a traffic citation.

Our solution:

We believed the investigating officer had formed conclusions which were contrary to the proper interpretation of the mechanics of the accident, based upon the available evidence; therefore, we took the case.

The other driver’s insurance company initially refused to discuss settlement, but after we developed our case, we were able to negotiate a settlement favorable to our client.

The problem:

Our client had a bad result from a corneal lens implant. Our investigation revealed that the ophthalmologist had failed to properly calibrate a piece of equipment prior to performing the procedure.

Our solution:

The doctor’s insurer was initially unwilling to discuss a substantial settlement of the claim. However, we enlisted the aid of a well-qualified ophthalmologist to prepare a report concerning the doctor’s departure from the applicable standard of care. Upon presenting this evidence to the doctor’s insurer, we were able to arrive at a settlement of the claim.

The problem:

Our firm had a case in which our client was injured while being transported in an ambulance. Subsequent to us receiving the case, the insurance company for the ambulance service became insolvent and was placed in receivership. The case was further complicated by the fact that our client was seriously ill and passed away during our representation.

Our solution:

We pursued the claim against the West Virginia Guarantee Fund, which is a statutory fund that resolves and pays claims against insolvent insurers. We were also able to obtain additional funds by settling with the client’s own automobile insurance carrier, under separate policies.

In this way, we maximized the uninsured motorist policy limits from both parties. These funds were made of part of our deceased client’s estate for the ultimate benefit of the family she left behind.